I put together a short presentation that outlines the executive compensation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (below).
Generally, the executive compensation provisions apply to all public companies. However, there is at least one that only applies to covered financial institutions (the one subjecting such companies to enhanced compensation structure reporting and prohibitions).
Having discussed these provisions with a few folks at the Equilar ExecutiveCompensation Summit earlier this month, here are the provisions that will likely be the most burdensome for companies:
- The requirement to disclose median total annual compensation for all employees (other than the CEO)—total compensation is defined as in the proxy disclosure rules for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table. So, in effect, companies will need to fill out a summary compensation table (or at least determine the amounts that would be disclosed in that table) for every employee! Needless to say, this will be a massive undertaking and cost companies quite a bit to assemble.
- Developing and implementing a clawback policy—there are many open questions left by Dodd-Frank, so we’ll have to wait to see how the SEC fills things in. But as it stands now, drafting a clawback policy will be a bit of a challenge given the language of the Act, for example, how would the Act’s language apply to stock options? You couldn’t really be able to determine what the stock price would have been absent the restatement triggering the clawback, so what happens?
- Say on pay coupled with elimination of broker votes—could mean the first year of mandatory say on pay for all companies becomes a bit of a nail biter while everyone tries to figure out how things will work and how to ensure a sufficient favorable vote on companies’ compensation disclosed in the proxy.
- For covered institutions, they’ll have to wait a bit longer to see how the appropriate Federal regulators come down on compensation structures. Given the report of the Federal Reserve on large, complex banking organizations, I think it is safe to assume that these organizations’ compensation designs will be transformed once again.
Effective dates for the provisions are all over the map from immediately effective upon enactment, to having a delay of 6-, 9- or 12-months after enactment. It sounds like the House and Senate have ironed out their differences on this Act and the President is expected to sign it as soon as both houses of Congress pass it, which is expected to occur as soon as July 4th. So some of these provisions (most notably say on pay) most likely will be effective for the 2011 proxy season.
I hope you find the presentation helpful. If you have any questions or would like to discuss implications, just let me know.
RiskMetrics Group (RMG) recently issued several FAQs related to the new SEC proxy disclosure rules. Previously, I blogged about the RMG FAQ regarding Compensation Risk Disclosures, and today I will address the two other FAQs, one on compensation consultant conflicts and the other on the enhanced disclosure about directors – qualifications, diversity policies, and board leadership and risk oversight of risk management.
Compensation Consultant Conflicts
RMG was asked whether it would do with compensation consultant fee disclosures. RMG indicated that since this disclosure is new, it is waiting to gather and analyze the data after the proxy season and develop any new policies in consultation with its clients. So stay tuned, this one has the feel of the director overboarding issue and the tax gross-up issues which RMG first took some time to study and then came out with policies that directly dealt with the issues.
Do you think RMG will issue a 2011 policy on compensation consultant conflicts as a result of fee disclosures in 2010 proxies?
- Yes (100%, 2 Votes)
- No (0%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 2
Directors Enhanced Disclosures
RMG was asked what its views and the prospects for related voting recommendations were given the new director qualifications, diversity policies, and board leadership and oversight of risk management disclosures. Again RMG deferred a bit indicating that it was waiting to gather information and analyze the disclosures made this proxy season, but would not implement any policy changes as a result of these disclosures for 2010. My guess is that RMG will study the disclosures made, discuss the issues internally and with its clients and develop a set of new policies for 2011 that will seek to encourage a minimum level of disclosure on these issues and some minimum level of corporate governance as to this items.
Do you think RMG will issue one or more policies regarding directors as a result of the new 2010 directors disclosures?
- Yes (0%, 0 Votes)
- No (100%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 0
[print_link]

