ISS Burn Rate Caps: 2009-2014

On January 25, 2014, in Burn Rate, ISS, by Ed Hauder

This presentation explains the ISS Burn Rate methodology, the ISS 2014 Burn Rate Caps, and provides a historical perspective on the ISS Burn Rate Caps from 2009 through 2014:


New 2014 Burn Rate Calculator Posted

On December 24, 2013, in Burn Rate, ISS, ISS Policies, Run Rate, by Ed Hauder

Since ISS released its updated Burn Rate Caps table for 2014 on December 19, 2013, I have updated the Burn Rate Calculator to reflect the caps for 2014.  The calculator will enable you to calculate your ISS burn rate and traditional run rate for 2014 with just a few inputs.  The Burn Rate Calculator is kept under Reference Materials / Excel Tools and can be accessed at:


ISS Releases 2014 Policy Updates

On December 1, 2013, in ISS, ISS Policies, by Ed Hauder

On November 21, 2013, ISS posted its final policy updates for the 2014 proxy season.[1] While the updates were not as numerous as prior year’s updates, they were significant. The updates impact ISS’s vote recommendations on directors and say-on-pay (SOP) proposals.

Director Vote Recommendations

On the Director Vote Recommendations policy update, ISS basically implemented the policy it announced for 2014 as part of its 2013 policy updates, but with a few revisions to account for feedback it received. ISS will make director vote recommendations on a case-by-case basis after considering a number of factors. For 2014, if a board fails to act upon a shareholder proposal that received majority support during the prior year’s vote, ISS will consider:

  • The board’s outreach efforts to shareholders in the wake of the vote disclosed in the proxy;
  • The board’s rationale for the level of implementation of the proposal;
  • The subject matter of the shareholder proposal;
  • The level of support for and opposition to the proposal and the board’s/company’s engagement with shareholders;
  • The continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot either as a shareholder or management proposal; and
  • Other factors, as appropriate.

Say-on-Pay Vote Recommendations

With regards to ISS quantitative tests to assess a company’s pay-for-performance (P4P) alignment with respect to developing the ISS vote recommendation on say-on-pay proposals, ISS only revised one of the three quantitative tests, Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA). ISS introduced RDA for in 2012.  Under the old RDA formula, ISS took a weighted look at the company’s percentile rank of total shareholder return (TSR) and CEO pay against the ISS-selected peers on a 1- and 3-year basis. The old RDA formula weighted 1-year TSR and pay ranks at 40% and 3-year TSR and pay ranks at 60%, which effectively caused the most recent year to have a disproportionate impact on a company’s overall RDA score. For 2014, ISS is eliminating this weighted approach and will look solely to 3-year TSR and pay ranks.  However, ISS will utilize an annualized 3-year TSR to determine TSR rank and 3-year average CEO pay to establish pay rank.  This shift in the policy can hurt or help companies depending on where their recent performance has been relative to the prior two year’s performance.

ISS did not address whether the concern thresholds for the RDA test would remain the same or be revised for 2014. Given that ISS appears to be trying to grade companies on a curve, I would not be surprised to see the concerns levels for RDA be revised for 2014.

Effective Date for 2014 Policy Updates

ISS will apply the 2014 Policy Updates to shareholder meetings on or after February 1, 2014. ISS will release a complete set of updated policies in December 2013 (likely to include the  Burn Rate Caps for the 2014 proxy season as well as other revisions, perhaps even updates to the RDA concern levels).

[1] Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., ISS’s U.S. Corporate Governance Policy, 2014 Updates, November 21, 2013, available at:


On November 27, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the agenda and panelists for its December 5, 2013 roundtable on proxy advisors. The roundtable will be broken into two sessions.

The first session will explore the current use of proxy advisory services, including the factors that may have contributed to their use, the purposes and effects of using the services, and competition in the marketplace for such services.

The second session will explore issues identified in the Commission’s 2010 concept release on the U.S. proxy voting system, including potential conflicts of interest that may exist for proxy advisory firms and users of their services, and the transparency and accuracy of recommendations by proxy advisory firms.

For more information, please see: SEC Announces Agenda, Panelists For Roundtable On Proxy Advisory Services, available at:


Equilar (Glass Lewis ) Peer Group Update

On November 25, 2013, in Glass Lewis, by Ed Hauder

Last week, Equilar announced that it had opened up its peer group update process for companies.  Russell 3000 companies and Canadian companies in the S&P/TSX Composite Index can provide updated peer groups that will be disclosed with their next proxy covering pay decision made for this current fiscal year (i.e., calendar year companies that changed their peer group for 2013 pay decisions which will be disclosed as part of the company’s 2014 proxy).

Companies will be able to provide peer group updates until December 31, 2013. The updated peer groups will be used by Equilar in Equilar’s Pay for Performance Analysis and Glass Lewis’ (Say on Pay) pay for performance quantitative analysis. If a company does not update its peer group, Equilar will use the peer group the company disclosed in its 2013 public filing (proxy).

Companies that want to submit peer group updates can do so at the following Equilar website set up to take such submissions: