ISS has released updated versions of its FAQs and methodology documents for the 2020 proxy season.
Equity Compensation Plans Frequently Asked Questions
This updated set of FAQs was issued December 6, 2019 and is available at:
Notable changes include:
- ISS will include limited partnership units in Common Shares Outstanding for Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) and burn rate calculations if they are equivalent to common stock on a 1:1 basis and can be exchanged into common stock at any time at no cost to the holder.
- How ISS will evaluate an equity plan proposal seeking approval of one or more plan amendments—usually by using its Equity Plan Scorecard (EPSC) model.
- Confirming that evergreen features are now an overriding factor that will cause ISS to recommend against an equity plan proposal.
- Confirming that ISS changed some EPSC factor scores in the EPSC model, but kept the weights of the three pillars (plan cost, plan features, and grant practices) the same.
- Included the 2020 Burn Rate Benchmarks for the S&P 500, Russell 3000 (non-S&P 500) and Non-Russell 3000 groups in the Appendix.
Compensation Policies Frequently Asked Questions
ISS released this updated set of FAQs on December 6, 2019, available at:
Notable changes include:
- Confirming that the Financial Performance Assessment (FPA) will rely on four ISS-defined EVA metrics (EVA Margin, EVA Spread, EVA Momentum vs. Sales, and EVA Momentum vs. Capital), but confirming that the GAAP metrics which previously were used in the FPA will still be reported on ISS Proxy Reports.
- ISS will now report a 3-year Multiple of Median, but it will not be factored into the ISS Quantitative Pay-for-Performance (P4P) analysis.
- With respect to disclosure around termination and severance payments, ISS wants companies to clearly describe the type of termination (e.g., termination without cause, resignation for good reason, termination with cause, etc.) and the provision(s) by which severance payments were made under any agreement to avoid confusion and enable shareholders to assess such payments.
Pay-for-Performance Mechanics, ISS’ Qualitative and Qualitative Approach
ISS released this updated document on December 11, 2019, available at:
Provides some information on how EVA measures will be used in the FPA. Note that FPA only comes into account if a company’s initial quantitative P4P score level comes in at the low bordering medium or medium concern levels.
The other change of significance is that this document details the updated thresholds for the various concern levels under the Quantitative P4P tests. For example, High Concern under the Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA) test now starts at -60 whereas before it started at -50. This change should cause fewer companies to end up with a High Concern under the RDA test.
Peer Group Selection Methodology and Issuer Submission Process, Frequently Asked Questions
This updated set of FAQs was released December 6, 2019, and is available at: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/policy/latest/americas/US-Peer-Group-FAQ.pdf
No significant changes are noted in this set of FAQs.