<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EdwardHauder.com &#187; Pay for Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edwardhauder.com/category/pay-for-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edwardhauder.com</link>
	<description>Ed Hauder&#039;s Equity Compensation Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ISS Posts 2012 Compensation FAQs</title>
		<link>http://edwardhauder.com/2012/01/26/iss-posts-2012-compensation-faqs/</link>
		<comments>http://edwardhauder.com/2012/01/26/iss-posts-2012-compensation-faqs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hauder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting on Equity Plan Proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardhauder.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 25, 2012, ISS posted its first set of compensation frequently asked questions (FAQs) about its 2012 policies.  The policies covered include: Pay-for-Performance, Management Say on Pay Responsiveness and Equity Plans.  Below is a summary of the FAQs that were presented for each policy. Pay-for-Performance (P4P) CEOs who have not been in their positions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://edwardhauder.com/2012/01/26/iss-posts-2012-compensation-faqs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies Fighting ISS Negative Vote Recommendations</title>
		<link>http://edwardhauder.com/2011/03/28/companies-fighting-iss-negative-vote-recommendations/</link>
		<comments>http://edwardhauder.com/2011/03/28/companies-fighting-iss-negative-vote-recommendations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hauder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardhauder.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several companies have gone on the offensive this year when ISS issued negative vote recommendations against their proxy proposals, especially in the context of failing the ISS pay-for-performance policy.  These companies include Hewlett Packard, Headwaters, Disney and Tyco International. These companies waited for ISS to issue its negative vote recommendation and then filed additional supplemental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://edwardhauder.com/2011/03/28/companies-fighting-iss-negative-vote-recommendations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Will Your Company Fare Under RiskMetrics&#8217; Pay For Performance Policy?</title>
		<link>http://edwardhauder.com/2010/01/14/how-will-your-company-fare-under-riskmetrics-pay-for-performance-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://edwardhauder.com/2010/01/14/how-will-your-company-fare-under-riskmetrics-pay-for-performance-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hauder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardhauder.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as I&#8217;m sure you know, RiskMetrics consolidated its Pay for Performance (P4P) Policies into a more unified approach for 2010.  Additionally, RiskMetrics tweaked the P4P Policy a bit.  However, the initial screen applied to determine whether a more in-depth analysis is warranted remains comparing a company&#8217;s 1- and 3-year Total Shareholder Returns (TSR) to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://edwardhauder.com/2010/01/14/how-will-your-company-fare-under-riskmetrics-pay-for-performance-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

